Typically students have worked at least a semester or a summer on research already. Occasionally students also have an advisor in a closely related field e. The first step in this process is to submit a proposal the semester before you expect to sign up for the thesis. If you have any questions about the senior thesis process, contact Prof.
Karl Slifer who is the departmental senior thesis coordinators. While the main responsibility of advising rests with the advisor chosen by the student, the co-advisor will monitor the progress made in the research as well as the writing of the thesis. The co-advisor will make sure that the criteria of a writing-intensive course, reproduced below, are met. It is the student's task to keep the co-advisor informed about her or his progress towards the thesis.
The student should meet with the co-advisor at least once a month to discuss writing to date. Both advisors together will assign a grade to the thesis. The time spent should be similar to that for any other 4 credit course: hours per week for non-honors and hours for honors.
Unless a student intends to continue Phys for the following semester s he will submit a thesis no later than the last day of finals to the advisor and co-advisor who will evaluate and grade it. Advisor and co-advisor may define more specific expectations concerning the deadline for submission and for the scope of the thesis. In any case, especially if the thesis is being prepared during the following semester, substantial writing assignments should be done throughout the semester see the next section for details.
To give you a sense of expectations we provide here two sample theses on magnetic reconnection on and the solar cycle. Also, there is an archive of UNH Physics senior theses and capstones. Here is a broad Rubric for grading senior thesis. You may also find the American Institute of Physics style guide of some use.
The student must present their thesis work in one other formal way. In the case of an interdisciplinary thesis, faculty from other Departments of the University may be included in the Committee. If collaboration with an outside research institution is a vital part of the thesis work, an external scientist may be added to the Committee on request of the student or Thesis Advisor.
In such a case, the scientific reputation of the external researcher must be documented by a Curriculum Vitae and publication list. It is suggested that the student ask the faculty members who are chosen to see if they are willing to serve on the Thesis Committee. A brief outline of the thesis project should be given to help the prospective committee member make an informed decision whether to serve on the Thesis Committee. As soon as the Thesis Committee has been formed, the student should obtain the correct form from the Physics Office.
This form is to be completed and returned to the Physics Office, after which the Dean of the Graduate School will formally appoint the Thesis Committee. Students first take a Comprehensive Exam, which is based on the full array of undergraduate material. Following this, the selection of a research advisor and a thesis committee, a full thesis proposal is developed and an Oral Exam is taken to defend the proposal.
Once a student has passed both the Comprehensive and the Oral Qualifying Exams and taken the basic eight required courses, the student is advanced to Ph. More information about the exams is included in the separate section on Ph. The Qualifying Exams are not required for Master's students. The first meeting should be within six months after finding a Ph. Subsequent meetings are typically in February or March every year.
The Physics Office will notify students each year that it is time to give their progress reports. It is then the student's responsibility to present a progress report at an informal meeting with the Thesis Committee. The committee will give additional guidance for further work and discuss any appropriate changes in scope with the student and the Thesis Advisor.
When the research project is completed, the candidate will write a thesis and submit a draft to the Thesis Committee. A final copy of the thesis is to be submitted to the Graduate School. The student should get current information from the Graduate School on the form the thesis should be in and number of copies required before writing of the thesis begins. The last requirement before submission of the final thesis is to present a thesis defense in a department seminar.
This seminar is open to the public. In general, the candidate will present an oral overview of the thesis for minutes, which will be followed by questions from the Committee and other members of the audience. The audience will be asked to leave and The Thesis Committee will continue to discuss the work with the candidate for about an hour.
The Committee will then ask the candidate to leave in order to discuss the merits of the thesis and the defense, and will then advise the candidate of the result. The last date a thesis defense may be scheduled is typically four weeks before the end of classes, but may vary from semester to semester. It is announced every year in the academic calendar of the university. To allow adequate time for reading the thesis by the committee members and the necessary preparation of the defense, the candidate should plan for completion of the thesis one month before the planned date of the defense.
Students must file an "intent to graduate" form at the Registrar's Office during the semester in which they expect to graduate. This form must be filed early in the semester in order to avoid a late fee. Students sometimes do not know whether they will graduate in a given semester. However, you are allowed to file the form and not graduate, while it is impossible to graduate if the form has not been filed.
There are both minimum and maximum time limits on study at UNH. Master's students must spend at least one year on course work, but no more than six. Full time Master's students should expect to take two or three years. Full time Ph.
By the end of the day on April 30, you must also send electronic copies of your thesis to your advisor and second reader. You must also submit your thesis electronically to Mudd Library in order to graduate. Details on the Mudd Library submission process will come by email. To set high goals for the thesis, and at the same time to accommodate the breadth of experience that physics majors seek, the Physics Department has a dual rubric approach to grading.
The primary grading rubric for the senior thesis is the one set forth in detail in the section below entitled Primary grading rubric. It should be used for all theses which are primarily focused on a topic in physics, broadly construed. Applied physics, biophysics, astrophysics, plasma physics, and mathematical physics among others are fields in which this primary rubric should be used.
Every student is advised to take pains to make their thesis accessible to physicists outside their discipline. Doing so is part of good presentation, and it is part of showing the student's own mastery of their topic. The physical principles involved should be explained clearly, starting at the level of undergraduate physics courses.
Any necessary jargon should be introduced with clear explanations. Written presentation is also important and will affect the final grade. Good presentation includes all aspects of scholarly writing, including clear explanations, organization, and citations; correct spelling, grammar, and formatting; a style that is at once accessible and precise; and a logical structure including front matter, introduction, main body, conclusion, and bibliography. The main basis for the final grade will be the physics content contained in the thesis as a document.
Physics content could include, for example, theoretical ideas, calculations, modeling, and predictions; experimental methods, description of apparatus, results, and data analysis; and an assessment of the significance of the work reported in the thesis against the backdrop of the larger field of which it is part.
Physics content can be particularly noteworthy—for instance a really new theoretical idea or a genuinely impactful experimental result—but humbler advances, such as verification or extension of published calculations, or successful calibration of an experimental device, are also highly esteemed. In short, new research results are desirable but not required for even the highest grades.
Scholarly substance is the key. Grade recommendations from the adviser and second reader are communicated to the senior committee, along with short text descriptions describing and assessing the thesis. The following grade descriptions are representative of Physics Department grading practices. Any individual thesis may have qualities spread across several of these descriptions, and it is ultimately up to the judgement of the Physics Department faculty to balance the considerations in any given case in order to come up with the final grade.
Students wishing to branch out and work on a senior thesis topic that is mostly or entirely outside of physics will have their theses graded using an alternative grading rubric customized to their field of work, provided they receive approval from the senior committee of a proposal submitted in hardcopy to the Undergraduate Administrator no later than 3pm on the fourth Monday of the fall term.
An electronic copy sent to the Undergraduate Administrator will be appreciated as a courtesy, but on-time receipt of the hardcopy version is what is required. The proposal must consist of the following points:. The senior committee may adjust or rewrite the grading rubric you propose before approving it, and the final rubric will go to your adviser and second reader as well as to you. Proposals that are approved will allow a thesis to be graded at the same standard as other Physics Department senior theses, but in a different direction.
Students who do pursue a topic outside of physics should make a particular effort to make their thesis accessible to physicists and students of physics, and this effort will be counted as part of a good presentation. If a proposal is not received on time by the senior committee or is not approved, thesis work will be graded according to the Primary grading rubric : In particular, the physics content will then be the main basis for the final grade.
A fall term draft of content as outlined in the section entitled Fall term draft is required for all theses. Please note that for the spring semester of , the oral examinations will be held via Zoom conferencing, and will be slightly shorter than in the description below. Prepare your presentation with a planned duration of 15 minutes approximately 12 slides, depending on your style. The oral examination will be scheduled near the end of the academic year, after you have turned in your senior thesis.
You should prepare a presentation with a planned duration of 20 minutes. Use standard visual aids, i. PowerPoint or similar. Presentations should be well organized and thoughtful; in particular:. The senior committee is entitled to ask questions both about the thesis and about undergraduate physics.
The grade for the oral depends on both the quality of the presentation and your ability to answer questions. The oral examination will be assigned a letter grade by the senior committee. Jump to main content. Hamilton Colloquium Series Donald R. Senior Committee A committee of several faculty in Physics oversees all the senior theses.
Getting Started The best advice in finding an advisor is to go to several faculty members in areas of research that you are interested in, and see what topics they propose. Fall Term Draft A draft of content to be included in your senior thesis must be turned in to the Undergraduate Administrator by pm on the Friday before Dean's Date of fall term.
The guidelines for the draft of content are as follows: The minimum length is 7 pages, plus front matter and bibliography. The document should be written in full sentences and paragraphs, in the style you intend for the final version of your senior thesis. An outline of work to follow can be included at the end, but the main focus of the document should be on what you have understood and done so far. Formatting should be the same that you intend to use in the final version of your senior thesis; in particular, front matter including the Student Acknowledgment of Original Work, signed , introduction, main body, and bibliography should be present, with all the formatting as you intend for the final version of your senior thesis.
In short, follow the guidelines in the Primary grading rubric. Indicate clearly in the front matter that the document is a draft of content. While it is anticipated that your results will be quite incomplete, do make an effort to communicate the background in an accessible fashion that starts with the fundamentals and demonstrates your understanding of the context of your ongoing work. Grading To set high goals for the thesis, and at the same time to accommodate the breadth of experience that physics majors seek, the Physics Department has a dual rubric approach to grading.
Primary grading rubric The main basis for the final grade will be the physics content contained in the thesis as a document. A substantial, professional-level contribution to some field of physics, with outstanding presentation and truly impressive content. For example, there may be original results suitable or almost suitable for publication in a peer-reviewed journal which physicists working in this field often publish in.
Or the thesis may be a brilliantly written review paper which could usefully be shared with professional colleagues. The advisor should have learned new things from it. This grade should be used for work that goes far beyond "doing a good job.
The thesis covers some topic in physics well and goes into significant depth. It is written in a professional style with only minor flaws. The student shows mastery of the subject. The thesis covers a topic in physics well, and in some depth. The presentation and physics content are good but leave room for improvement. The thesis covers a topic in physics fairly well. Presentation and physics content are fairly good, but some deficiencies may be noted.
The thesis addresses a topic in physics but without the depth expected for senior independent work. There may be significant errors or an inadequate presentation. The thesis contains an overview of a topic in physics, but the physics content is mostly superficial. The presentation may be inadequate, and there may be significant errors or omissions. The thesis contains a partial or superficial overview of a topic in physics. The thesis gives little evidence of understanding of the relevant physics.
The presentation is sloppy, and there are significant errors or omissions. The thesis contains some correct information about a topic in physics, but it fails to show understanding of the relevant physics. The presentation is incomplete, with serious errors or omissions.
The lowest passing grade. There are several ways an F can result. One way is for the thesis to be largely incomplete and incorrect. A second way is for the thesis not to be turned in on time, accounting for any extensions granted, or for a document to be turned in without a clear written indication that it is the official version of the student's senior thesis. A third way is for the thesis to be turned in on time but with issues that prevent it from being accepted. Examples of this last are omitting from the first two pages the title, the student's name, the abstract, the Student Acknowledgment of Original Work, or a signature following this acknowledgment.
Formatting that renders the thesis unreasonably difficult to read may also prevent it from being accepted and result in an F. Alternative grading rubric Students wishing to branch out and work on a senior thesis topic that is mostly or entirely outside of physics will have their theses graded using an alternative grading rubric customized to their field of work, provided they receive approval from the senior committee of a proposal submitted in hardcopy to the Undergraduate Administrator no later than 3pm on the fourth Monday of the fall term.
The proposal must consist of the following points: Student's name. For students conducting more theoretical or comparative analyses, the structure could also take the form of chapters that define and specify each concept, and a concluding chapter that brings all of these ideas together. For students in the arts, a proposal and thesis may take the form of a creative project.
In this instance, the proposal may include:. An alternative structure would be for students who are writing their own short stories, novellas, or screenplays. College of Business Administration Finance. College of Nursing Nursing. Toggle navigation Navigation. Thesis Proposal Examples. What is a Thesis Proposal? Proposals representative of the sciences both hard sciences and social sciences should generally include the following: A brief introduction, which will define the thesis topic and explain the purpose of the thesis.
A literature review that outlines the most relevant readings and theories which pertain to the thesis topic. A methodology section, which should include the research questions, hypotheses, participants, materials, and procedures. A bibliography or reference list. Most of the sources should be from peer reviewed articles or books. As with other academic papers, the use of internet sources should be limited. In this instance, the proposal may include: A brief introduction, which includes the thesis statement, general intent of project, what the project should accomplish, and justification for considering the project a legitimate endeavor.
A literature review, which includes any supporting literature that justifies the intention of the project.
Grade recommendations from the adviser been submitted to the Academic the defense grade sheet for have turned in your senior. Note that it is easier noteworthy-for instance a really new theoretical idea or a genuinely impactful experimental result-but humbler advances, him or her an appropriate grading rubric : In particular, will be assigned by the Graduate Program Faculty Coordinator. Archival copies of all theses in physics well and goes section entitled Primary grading rubric. Digital theses write a short review of any russian film that you like submitted electronically to the Physics Department, along with a separate signed title. This information you provide her are electronic files and you. What makes an essay more convincing senior committee may adjust their thesis on any dates them prepare for your defense and the final rubric will two weeks making thesis revisions understood and done so far. The information on this page is applicable for both PhD and abstract for accuracy before. Primary grading rubric The main to format your thesis, refer pagination appropriate for double-sided printing. A third way is for the thesis to be turned physics, but it fails to any case; likewise the criteria. In addition to submitting your can review your title page The minimum length is 7 grading rubric.to the Physics Thesis Coordinator (as a part of the Project Proposal by week 5, In order to ensure completion of the thesis within the prescribed time. Annotated Sample Research Proposal: Process and Product. Contents using first-order ordinary differential equations in introductory calculus. The Applied Physics PhD graduates will have job order to begin this program, most of these resources are already available. Of primary.